Are no-account quit apps less effective?

Effectiveness depends on whether you use the tool during urges — not on whether email was collected. Some people adhere better with less friction; others adhere better with cloud backups and community.

What happens if I clear my browser data in Hold90?

Local data can be lost if you clear site storage or switch devices without a backup habit you control. That is the tradeoff of local-first design.

Can account apps be private enough?

Sometimes, with strong policies and settings. “Private enough” is personal. If you do not want a quit profile at all, choose a no-account app.

Quit smoking apps with an account vs without

The first screen of many quit apps asks for email. Sometimes that unlocks sync, coaches, and community. Sometimes it is just friction before you can log day one. As of 2026, the account vs no-account choice is one of the cleanest ways to narrow the field — including whether Hold90’s local PWA model fits you.

Overview

Account-based apps store your quit profile in the cloud so you can switch devices, join challenges, message coaches, or restore purchases. No-account apps keep setup short and data closer to the device, at the cost of automatic sync.

Hold90 is firmly in the no-account camp for core tracking and 90-second holds. Other popular apps — QuitNow, Smoke Free, Kwit, Nomo, Quit Genius, and similar — often use accounts for at least part of their value. Exact requirements change; check the version you install.

Who each is for

Want community leaderboards, multi-device restore, or clinician/coach linkage? An account is usually the right cost. Want to start during a craving without inventing a password? A no-account tool wins.

Privacy-sensitive quitters, shared-phone households, and people burned by app fatigue tend to prefer local-first designs like Hold90.

Privacy and accounts

Accounts mean identity plus whatever the privacy policy allows for analytics, support, and backups. Local-first means you must think about device loss and clearing browser storage. Neither is automatically “safer” in every threat model — but they fail differently. Read policies; do not rely on marketing adjectives.

Craving tools

Account status does not determine craving quality. A cloud app can have great urge tools; a local app can be only a counter. Hold90 pairs no-account access with a dedicated Hold 90 timer and games so the privacy choice does not cost you an in-the-moment protocol.

Pricing posture

Accounts often gate subscriptions. No-account apps may still offer optional paid unlocks. Judge price by what you need monthly, not by whether a login screen exists.

When to pick Hold90

Pick Hold90 when “no signup,” local tracking, PWA install, and ninety-second craving holds are the priority. Pick an account-based app when sync and social or coaching layers are the priority. Hybrid use is fine if you keep one primary quit clock to avoid confusion.

Disclaimer: Hold90 is a craving aid and private tracker, not medical advice or a guaranteed quit.

よくある質問

Are no-account quit apps less effective?: Effectiveness depends on whether you use the tool during urges — not on whether email was collected. Some people adhere better with less friction; others adhere better with cloud backups and community.
What happens if I clear my browser data in Hold90?: Local data can be lost if you clear site storage or switch devices without a backup habit you control. That is the tradeoff of local-first design.
Can account apps be private enough?: Sometimes, with strong policies and settings. “Private enough” is personal. If you do not want a quit profile at all, choose a no-account app.

次の90秒で足りる

Hold90を開いて理由を置き、最初の波を耐えてください。

アプリを開く